Although the two solutions are comparable in most areas, Meraki MX lacks a lot of features in comparison with Sophos XG.

ROI: Meraki MX and Sophos XG users alike are pleased with the ROI they receive from the solutions.Ĭomparison Results: Based on the parameters we compared, Sophos XG received better user ratings.Overall, Sophos XG users have been satisfied with the technical support, with a few exceptions of some reviewers who say that response time could be improved. Service and Support: Most Meraki MX users find that the service and support are good.Some Sophos XG users consider the solution to be pricey, while several others think the pricing is fair and affordable. Pricing: Some Meraki MX users say the pricing is expensive and think it could be lower.A few reviewers also say that the SD-WAN needs improvement. Users would like to see more integration options with other systems, and would like better reporting. Sophos XG reviewers say the solution is intuitive, has a great interface, and has strong VPN, firewalling, and intrusion detection. Users of Meraki MX would like to see more monitoring capabilities and feel that the security is not as strong as it could be. Meraki MX users like that the solution is flexible and easy to use and manage. Features: Users say both products have good stability and scalability.Ease of Deployment: The majority of reviewers of both products say the initial setup was straightforward.After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below. We performed a comparison between Meraki MX and Sophos XG based on our users’ reviews in five categories.

Meraki firewall